For people who are new to the world of nonprofits, there is often considerable confusion about the use of the term "non-profit" and "non-profit". Many organizations require referring to themselves as one or the other, and even some lawyers and accountants try to draw a bright line between organizations covered by these terms. Although there are technical differences between the two, they are generally used alternately.
There are some who claim that "profitability" should refer to organizations that work with the aim of never turning profits at all – every penny that comes in is used for the primary purpose of the organization. Essentially, this includes all charities, non-governmental organizations, civil society, private sector and other non-profit organizations. Often it is intended to explain that the company only puts it in place to survive – an attempt to reassess potential members and donors that no one benefits from the money that comes in.
Some attempt to discern non-profit as unlisted groups, such as social clubs, civil society, professional organizations and the like, but to place publicly sponsored charity organizations under the cooperatives. While this distinction can be understood, inconsistency with definition is difficult to apply. Often the bottom line of the group is to emphasize its own definition – an organization that, by design, does not distribute profits to individuals by the end of the year.
Legal law (both federal and state) effectively states that "nonprofit" and "profit" are synonymous. However, internal control offers a practical distinction in its own definition. According to Infernal Revenue Service, "non-profit" refers to certain activities, such as hobbies. "Profits" means an institution which is established for purposes other than profit. This definition does not necessarily mean charitable activity, but extends to all organizations that are not going to make a profit. Amateur sports clubs, blankets in carpets, social clubs and charity activities all fall under this definition.
Beyond the IRS, the distinction between the terms is also found in the background of those who use them. Lawyers, accountants and academics tend to choose the concept of profit, but fundraisers (and many who are profitable) prefer to use profitability. Again, it is likely that funding providers will not make a profit because it shows better that no person benefits from the fundraising. Or could it just be an exclusionary technique that helps those who know to know an outsider … but it's illegal to be a organized conspiracy!
The ultimate issue that causes unreasonable controversy is whether nonprofit should be a clue or not. Benefits of profit are not physically meaningful but profitable, but with-volumes are often used in general references. Active philosophers tend to leave a clue. Technically speaking, the symbol represents one adjective that changes one another. Here's "not" changing "profit" … not that this definition provides particularly useful knowledge unless one word that is not functional is a noun, but practical technology would be technically modified with adjectives, so that an additional noun would have to be attached such as non-profit companies.
What words you're going to use for your profit, just make sure you have a well-developed argument on the ready. Someone will ask about it … probably some. As long as you sound like you know what you are talking about, your argument will be repeated when they are asked about the difference.