While tests that measure creative or innovative personality are present, there are many extreme mistakes. Some are mentioned below:
a) Whether a creative or innovative type is usually, is highly controversial. Creativity can be defined as a problem of authentication and ideology – comprehensive talent. Creation can be defined as producing a variety of ideas, a variety of ideas and a number of novelty ideas – comprehensive talent. Properties are not stable or transferable over circumstances. Motivation is an important factor.
b) Due to numerous relevant definitions of creativity and innovation, it is clear that there are a variety of different and different abilities. It is illegal (or rare) that all abilities are present in one person.
c) Creation is an intellectual process and a matter of concern. Not everyone produces as much ideas about projects and the most important thing is that the same people do not produce equal amounts of ideas across projects.
d) Too many assumptions are made. Some have been identified: the premise that creativity and innovation are constant and progressive around the situation; incentives and skills are not brought to the ect. and more.
e) Collaboration, networks and such are ignored. Cognitive survey of the arts leads to a greater degree of creative output than produced by individuals alone.
f) You can share the general capabilities, variability and reliability of the test variable.
These issues are discussed in detail in the MBA thesis on creativity and innovation management that can be purchased (along with creativity and innovation DIY review, ideology and Power Point Presentation) from http: // www.managing creativity. com .
You can also get a regular free newsletter by entering your email address on this page.
You can free reproduce this article as long as no changes are made and the author's name and URL are kept.