The difference between creativity and innovation

I think creativity is definitely thinking of new ideas / things. Innovation is to make this new concept / role practical in novel fashion. Creativity is to dream new invention and innovation makes it real in its own unique way. When you come up with something new in existence, you can say that you created it. You can not say you have used it. And again when you add something already, you can not say you expected it, but you can tell yourself to innovate it.

Henry Ford established a assembly for car production. The Japanese perfected this concept by introducing their own unique innovations / changes / improvements. Many men are creative but they are not enough innovations to make their creation practical. Innovation makes creativity practical and effective. Most inventors fail because they are not innovative enough. Most painters are creative, but when they introduce innovation in their creation / art, they become artists. Without creation there is no product / concept that needs execution and when something new is thought it needs innovation. Research and development is about innovation. Sometimes innovation can lead to the impracticability of creation, and this new creative idea can be abandoned, and a new creative idea is born that innovation can lead to creation. Innovation is to give a new policy to the current idea.

It's a confusion and creativity between innovation and innovation, because innovation is about creating new ways to implement current / created concepts. Thus, they both have creativity in them. Innovation also includes creativity.

All doctoral courses are to explore new ways to make old things better and more efficient. Innovation is about solving existing problems. The bug level of innovation is research . At research institutes, they are creating better and better innovations for existing solutions. One does not need a doctorate for creativity, but for innovation at the forefront of the highest level, doctoral studies are almost necessary. In fact, at the tertiary level, innovation is chosen over creation. For all newly created ideas, there are disagreements until they can be scientifically defined, measured and tested, which involves complex and time-consuming research, not to mention finance. However, something is already in use and has proven its utility, and all of the reforms through innovation are adopted in its entirety. My own invention, "Vacuum Power Generators" and # 39; based on the principle that "nature obscures the vacuum"; on the other hand, it was restored to the highest level of the US government due to another audio code and "law on energy conservation". The law on energy conservation states that the energy you deposit will give less due to frictions. But in nature there are exemptions from these laws! Water pressure, strength strength gives back energy, then he takes in. And the vacuum strength is the strength of wind energy. But it's an untested and too radical idea and also requires tons of money to make a proto type. However, my little innovation about finishing small snacks in the baby milk bottle I could sell right away.

Creation is essential for innovation, as products need to be at least in concept because you can not innovate anything that does not exist. Thus, innovation is used to creativity, but creativity is not subject to innovation. While the better performance of creativity depends on innovation.

Creativity = Innovation while Innovation = Reforms to make it efficient and effective = Make it practical = Investigate new ways to create and improve creativity = The work to produce the same term in new and improved form.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *