Creativity can be defined as identification and ideology while innovation is defined as ideology, development and marketing.
There are different methods that increase knowledge of problems and ideology and, in the same way, different methods that enhance conceptualization, development and marketing. While it may not be for commercial purposes, this approach improves the likelihood that good ideas will be created and chosen and that investment in the development and marketing of these ideas will not be wasted.
One common mistake of leaders is often to rely on clad people to come up with great ideas. This is flawed for several reasons:
a) People's opinion is not what matters. The end user is obviously more important as his or her use will be a success or failure. Unfortunately, it is too often the case that a sufficient end-use analysis is lacking before an investment is awarded to GO. One of many ways to evaluate end users' users is to use buyers experience page and utility layers to determine the ultimate value of an idea.
b) People's opinion is less worthwhile than views of many people and numerous diversity and innovation. The result is an intellectual cross-pollination that conquers of involuntary parochialism and leads to a framework of violation.
c) It is possible that cognitive healing is similar to experience. Each one produces a set of results but together they form a richer performance. Again, this leads to the conclusion that great diversity and novels make a better production.
These issues are discussed in detail in the MBA thesis on creativity and innovation management that can be purchased (along with creativity and innovation DIY review, ideology and PowerPoint Presentation) from http: // www.managing creativity. com .
You can also get a regular free newsletter by entering your email address on this page.
Kal Bishop, MBA
You are free to recreate This article as long as no changes are made and the author name and URL are kept.